scott.marlowe wrote:

Please note that this is not necessarily true. If my server has been up a while and I stop/restart the postmaster, it may have a fairly high id number and it is quite possible that in x number of days time, the children will be created with a wrapped pid which is lower than the postmasters. Just look for the - switches that make it obvious. In fact, this IS currently the case right now on my server:


13081 ?        S      2:30 /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postmaster
13082 ?        S      0:19 postgres: stats buffer process
13083 ?        S      0:28 postgres: stats collector process
 5600 ?        S      0:00 postgres: marlowe phone [local] idle

In this case 13081 is my postmaster.


Hey Scott,


                Thanks for your input !
                Of course you're correct here with the possibility
                of PID's rolling over - and I considered describing
                exactley what you have here in my original email.

                My original was getting longer than I anticipated,
                so I simply thought to myself "yeah it happens, but
                don't add a bunch more explanation, since the
                scenario is kinda uncommon".

                I should have known better !   This group is too
                sharp to let anything slip through     :-)

Terry









---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
     joining column's datatypes do not match

Reply via email to