Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
  
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 04:03:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
    
Given the current implementation, it seems like there are three possible
behaviors for COMMENT ON DATABASE when the database name isn't the same
as the current database:
      

  
There's a fourth possibility:  ignore the command and issue a WARNING.
    

Hmm, that seems like a reasonable choice.  Anyone have an objection?

My personal experience would lead me to believe that this is the best option.  Count it a vote in favor.
			regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

               http://archives.postgresql.org

        Andrew Biagioni

Reply via email to