check the archive search now and let me know if you find it still doesn't work ...
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Ang Chin Han wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > okay, first off ... what URL? I've been working on, and testing, archives > > all week, and altho getting things down below a 2min search appears to be > > near impossible (anyone know something *better* then mnogosearch that will > > handle >250k URLs and growing ... ? we tried ht/Dig before, and the > > resources it suck'd were outrageous) ... > > (I assume we're talking about the email archives). > > How about a quick and dirty script (perl, maybe) that grabs everything, > "intelligently" chucks the pseudo contents (stripping message quotes for > instance) into a pgsql table, and then see if tsearchv2 can be used to > search it via another quick and dirty CGI? Have to find some place to > host it though, the db might be huge. > > Eating our own dog food and all that. > > -- > Linux homer 2.4.18-14 #1 Wed Sep 4 13:35:50 EDT 2002 i686 i686 i386 > GNU/Linux > 6:30pm up 253 days, 9:51, 5 users, load average: 5.00, 5.00, 5.00 > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
