At 06:24 PM 9/25/2003 , Tom Lane wrote:
>Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> We have several beta testers who keep us honest on exactly this point;
> >> they use compilers that do not take //. Personally I wish gcc could
> >> be configured not to have these little non-ANSI-isms ...
I suspect that among the conformance switches, you can find a combination
you like:
----------------------------------
Language Options
-ansi -fall-virtual -fcond-mismatch -fdollars-in-identifiers
-fenum-int-equiv -fexternal-templates -fno-asm -fno-builtin
-fhosted -fno-hosted -ffreestanding -fno-freestanding
-fno-strict-prototype -fsigned-bitfields -fsigned-char
-fthis-is-variable -funsigned-bitfields -funsigned-char
-fwritable-strings -traditional -traditional-cpp -trigraphs
---------------------------------
Also, look at the warning options "-pedantic" and "-pedantic-errors".
-- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE --
This message is intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to whom it is
addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt
from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended addressee, nor
authorized to receive for the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you may
not use, copy, disclose or distribute to anyone the message or any information
contained in the message. If you have received this message in error, please
immediately advise the sender by reply email, and delete the message. Thank you.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
