On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Stephan Szabo writes:
>
> > It's not a problem for me unless I'm compiling with CFLAGS="-std=c89".
>
> Don't do that then. :-)
Well, the discussion started with Tom trying to find an option that
disallowed // comments for gcc. :)
> I don't agree with cluttering the compile line with -D_GNU_SOURCE just for
> the case when someone adds additional unsupported compiler flags. We
> might as well add -fhosted just in case someone tries to compile with
> -ffreestanding.
Fundamentally however, having configure run with a fundamentally different
compilation environment from an actual build (which _GNU_SOURCE basically
does) is dangerous. Even without -std=c89, can we say for sure that the
environment without it is exactly the same as with it?
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
