Naomi Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We are running Postgres 7.3.4 on Solaris 6 on an E3500. I noticed the
> following messages, and attempted to remedy the situation by upping our
> wal_buffers to 64, thinking we might need more room.
> 2004-02-05 16:48:16 LOG: recycled transaction log file 0000000600000029
> 2004-02-05 16:48:27 LOG: recycled transaction log file 000000060000002A
> 2004-02-05 16:48:27 LOG: recycled transaction log file 000000060000002B
This is normal operation. I'm not sure why we have it as LOG level and
not DEBUG-something. I suppose the messages are slightly useful to give
an idea of how fast you are using up log segments, but now that
wal_files isn't a separately tweakable parameter it's not obvious why
the average DBA would care.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
