scott.marlowe wrote: > Also, running on SCSI drives will be much faster than running on IDE > drives if the IDE drives have their caches disabled like they should, > since they lie otherwise. Since SCSI disks don't usually lie, and are > designed to handle multiple requests in parallel, they are much > faster as parallel load increases. If you're writing a lot, you > should either have a great number of IDE drives with the write cache > turned off, like some of the newer storage devices made of ~100 IDE > drives, or you should have SCSI. SCSI's advantage won't be as great > as the number of drives approaches infinity. But for 1 to 10 drives > my guess is that SCSI is gonna be a clear winner under parallel load.
Nice to see old fashioned misinformation being spread around the place... Peter ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html