On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 06:04:10PM -0500, Chris Browne wrote:
>
> The FSF web site then compares various variations on "BSD licenses,"
> considering that there are some that they deem to be "free" (in their
> terms), and that there are others that they deem to _NOT_ be "free"
> (again in their terms).
To be fair to the FSF, they have never claimed that the original BSD
license was not a free license. It just wasn't compatible with the
GPL, because of the advertising clause.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
