Christopher Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After takin a swig o' Arrakan spice grog, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) belched out:
>> Bill Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Interestingly the same 7.4.1 binary running on a different machine did
>>> not exhibit the problem. Could it be a Solaris patch level thing?
>>
>> Seems likely. Can you update and see if that fixes it?
> Hmm... I think I have seen the same thing.
Interesting. I forgot to mention that a likely workaround (in 7.4.*
anyway) is to use CIDR-style specification of host+mask: "127.0.0.1/32"
instead of "127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255". That would avoid calling
getaddrinfo for the troublesome value. But it would be nice to verify
whether this is a Solaris bug or our own fault.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
