--- Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > > On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Jaime Casanova wrote: > > > There is a way to not enforce the creation of a > > primary or unique index on a referenced table? > > Not really. It's not the index that's important > per-se, it's the uniqueness that is implied.
OK. What about to teach the planner always do a seq on that table and do not ask for use the index? but not using "set" instructions. can i do that? _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Información de Estados Unidos y América Latina, en Yahoo! Noticias. Visítanos en http://noticias.espanol.yahoo.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
