Kris Kiger wrote:
> search_test=# explain analyze SELECT count(q) FROM product,
> to_tsquery('oil') AS q WHERE vector @@ q;
> QUERY PLAN
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Aggregate (cost=67847264.50..67847264.50 rows=1 width=32) (actual
> time=83311.552..83311.555 rows=1 loops=1)
> -> Nested Loop (cost=12.50..67839764.50 rows=3000001 width=32)
> (actual time=0.204..81960.198 rows=226357 loops=1)
> Join Filter: ("outer".vector @@ "inner".q)
> -> Seq Scan on product (cost=0.00..339752.00 rows=3000000
> width=32) (actual time=0.100..27415.795 rows=3000000 loops=1)
> -> Materialize (cost=12.50..22.50 rows=1000 width=32) (actual
> time=0.003..0.006 rows=1 loops=3000000)
> -> Function Scan on q (cost=0.00..12.50 rows=1000
> width=32) (actual time=0.020..0.024 rows=1 loops=1)
> Total runtime: 83311.735 ms
> (7 rows)
The explain analyze output doesn't show that a gist index on the vector column is
being used.
This is because either you don't have an index defined and\or the query is causing a
poor plan to
be chosen. I've found that putting to_tsquery in the FROM clause does not execute
fast.
Try rewriting the query as:
explain analyze SELECT count(to_tsquery('oil')) FROM product WHERE vector @@
to_tsquery('oil');
or
explain analyze SELECT count(*) FROM product WHERE vector @@ to_tsquery('oil');
George Essig
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
