On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 11:14:03PM -0800, William Yu wrote: > > I'm not sure why people say one is better than the other. Both will > survive the loss of 2 drives -- they're just different drives.
Partly, I think, people who've used both hate 0+1 because of the recovery cost. In most 0+1 arrangements (I'm aware of none which don't do this), you have to re-sync the entire thing in case you lose even one drive. Performance really suffers at that point. A -- Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now. --J.D. Baldwin ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html