Jeff Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When I tested with our system, it would not attempt to retrieve that first
> WAL
> via the restore command. All the ones after that it was happy to do it for,
> but if that one did not exist, it told me to get lost.
Would you be more specific please? Looking at the code, I can't see a
reason that the first one would be treated differently from others.
What *exactly* did you get?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
