Well i guess that there are cases where that is not so.However i
understand that postgres does not have any way accept
the automatic.
Tom Lane wrote:
Tsirkin Evgeny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What i realy want is to say to postgres that the particular
table should be cached .
Adopting the position that you are smarter than an automatic
optimization algorithm is generally a good way to achieve less
performance, not more.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
