Chris Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is what is pointing me to a problem with one of the db's. It
> appears that the sqlca code has had to of changed between the 7.3.4
> and 8 code and is now behaving in a different (and unexpected) manner.
There is no "sqlca" in the backend protocol at all, so I really dunno
what is causing the change in behavior.
> BTW, which version is correct? Should a no rows return query give a 0
> or a 100?
I suspect 100 is correct, but you'd have to go read the ODBC spec to
be sure.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
