Tom Lane wrote:

> This has been discussed before (try the pgsql-jdbc list archives).
> I believe we concluded that an appropriate fix was to not consider the
> cancel request "done" until the client sees the separate connection
> dropped by the postmaster.  libpq's cancel functions wait for that to
> happen, and I thought that JDBC had been fixed as well --- maybe you are
> using an old driver version?

I thought this got done too, but looking at the current JDBC driver code
 I don't see it..

-O

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to