Tom Lane wrote: > Unfortunately, the SQL committee did tremendous damage to that > argument by changing the definitions of some of those views in > SQL2003 :-(
The only changes to existing views were one renamed column and two or three cases with relaxed permission checks so that more objects are now shown. I do not expect any application to break. > (We haven't caught up to the SQL2003 behavior yet, but I believe > Peter Eisentraut is working on it for PG 8.2.) I'm committing it now. Thanks for reminding me -- I had almost forgotten about that patch. :) -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
