adey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I apologise if I am uninformed, but it is my understanding that REINDEX is > still required even with the most regular of vacuums?
REINDEX shouldn't be required at all under normal circumstances.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
