Phillip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Perhaps a LVM group would be appropriate in this situation if you have
> the luxury of being able to implement that somehow...
Indeed, the existence of LVM and similar tools is exactly why we don't
deem it pressing to come up with Oracle-like tablespace management.
If you want a tablespace to span multiple physical volumes, use LVM.
The Postgres project tries to avoid re-inventing perfectly good wheels ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
