Hi,
No - not conclusive reason to think it won't work - just would
like verification (if it exists) that it does work.
Note - though the targets are different, the file is being
opened/read by 2 different uncompress -c s...
Thanks
Susan
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 22 14:18:10 2008
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on borise.harvard.edu
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=ham
version=3.1.8
X-Spam-Level:
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:18:03 -0500
From: "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Susan Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] CORRECTION to msg 'loading same instance of dump to
two different servers simultaneously'
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
No need to crosspost. I removed -performance from the Cc.
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:37:43 -0500 (EST)
Susan Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm wondering if anyone has had success doing a simultaneous
> load of one Pg dump to two different servers? The load command
> is actually run from two different workstations, but reading the
> same pgdump-file.
Do you have any reason to doubt that this would work? Have you tried
it? As long as the targets are different I don't see any problem.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
