G'day, I am just running a straight pg_dump with no options. With the -Fc option the DB size is reduced to about: 700MB
Is the -Fc a compressed format? Are there any limitations or side effects to using this output, is it slower?? etc etc. Can this output be restored via the normal method of: psql dbname < sql.dump Thanks. Steve On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:30:07 +0200, Thomas Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 12:06:53PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am curious as to why a pg dump of database "name" is 2.9gig. But is >> measured at 1.66gig by: >> SELECT pg_database_size(pg_database.datname) AS db_size FROM pg_database >> WHERE pg_database.datname='name' ; >> >> This dump was about 1 gig around 12 months ago. > > Which options do you use for pg_dump? And what version of PosgreSQL are > you running? > > In general it's not that strange for an uncompressed > dump to be larger than the database size, plain SQL > dumps are much less space efficient than a DBMS can > be when it stores the data on disk. But of course, there > also indices to consider. > > Have you tried pg_dump -Fc? > >> I am performing a monthly vacuum full on the database and a nightly > vacuum >> all > > That should only impact the pg_database_size. -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
