On Thursday 03 June 2010 11:45, Tom Lane wrote: > Kevin Kempter <kev...@consistentstate.com> writes: > > On Thursday 03 June 2010 11:18, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Bizarre ... that command really oughtn't be invoking any non-builtin > >> operator, but the OID is too high for a builtin. What do you get from > >> "select 33639::regoperator"? > > > > postgres=# select 33639::regoperator > > postgres-# ; > > regoperator > > ---------------- > > abc.=(oid,oid) > > (1 row) > > So where did that come from, and why is it defined incorrectly? > (Evidently it's marked oprcanhash but there is no associated hash > opclass.) I can hardly see a reason to define your own oid equality > operator, much less a wrong one ... > > regards, tom lane
I dont know where it came from. I havent intentionally defined any classes, or anything like this. However this is a dev instance so maybe something went wrong at some point. -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
