I am using slony1-2.0.3 and needed to make some wholesale changes, so like 
other times I stopped all slon processes on my master box as well as on the 2 
slave machines.  I then dropped the slony schema on all three, completely 
removing it, made my changes.  I then ran my slonik script at the master, 
started up all of the slon processes and ran my subscribe script on both 
slaves.  My problem, is that only one of the slaves got the copy and synched, 
the other one just hangs at this point:



2010-06-23 03:43:18 EDT CONFIG storeListen: li_origin=1 li_receiver=3 
li_provider=1

2010-06-23 03:43:18 EDT CONFIG storeListen: li_origin=2 li_receiver=3 
li_provider=1

2010-06-23 03:43:18 EDT CONFIG storeListen: li_origin=1 li_receiver=3 
li_provider=1

2010-06-23 03:43:18 EDT CONFIG storeListen: li_origin=2 li_receiver=3 
li_provider=1

2010-06-23 03:43:18 EDT CONFIG storeListen: li_origin=1 li_receiver=3 
li_provider=1

2010-06-23 03:43:18 EDT CONFIG storeListen: li_origin=2 li_receiver=3 
li_provider=1

2010-06-23 03:43:19 EDT CONFIG remoteWorkerThread_1: update provider 
configuration

2010-06-23 03:44:01 EDT CONFIG storeSubscribe: sub_set=1 sub_provider=1 
sub_forward='f'

NOTICE:  subscribe set: omit_copy=f

2010-06-23 03:44:02 EDT CONFIG storeListen: li_origin=1 li_receiver=3 
li_provider=1

2010-06-23 03:44:02 EDT CONFIG storeListen: li_origin=2 li_receiver=3 
li_provider=1

2010-06-23 03:44:02 EDT INFO   copy_set 1 - omit=f - bool=0

2010-06-23 03:44:02 EDT INFO   omit is FALSE

2010-06-23 03:44:02 EDT CONFIG version for "dbname=holly host=linux2276 
port=5432 user=slony" is 80401

2010-06-23 03:44:02 EDT CONFIG remoteWorkerThread_1: connected to provider DB

2010-06-23 03:44:02 EDT CONFIG remoteWorkerThread_1: prepare to copy table 
"public"."hlm_owners"



I query the pg_stat_activity table and see that the table in question has been 
locked ....



I am using postgres 8.4.1.  This worked many times before, so I am wondering if 
I am running into some new condition.

Just wondering what else to possible check for?



joe

Reply via email to