Excerpts from Kasia Tuszynska's message of mar ago 10 15:08:20 -0400 2010:
> Hello Postgres Gurus,
>
> Is it expected behavior for the has_table_privilege postgres function to not
> handle the user PUBLIC? Or should I submit a bug?
>
> The has_table_privilege function does not handle PUBLIC - the following
> queries returns the error:
> SELECT has_table_privilege ('PUBLIC','bob.gdb.test1','SELECT') AS SELECT,
> has_table_privilege ('PUBLIC','bob.gdb.test1','INSERT') AS INSERT,
> has_table_privilege ('PUBLIC','bob.gdb.test1','DELETE') AS DELETE,
> has_table_privilege ('PUBLIC','bob.gdb.test1','UPDATE') AS UPDATE;
>
> ERROR: role "PUBLIC" does not exist
Yeah, this is a bug, see
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4399EF7A-9419-4F84-B51A-A55C5EFAC12A%40nasby.net
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
