On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Bryan Keller <brya...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am considering running a Postgres with the database hosted on a NAS via > NFS. I have read a few things on the Web saying this is not recommended, as > it will be slow and could potentially cause data corruption. > > My goal is to have the database on a shared filesystem so in case of server > failure, I can start up a standby Postgres server and point it to the same > database. I would rather not use a SAN as I have heard horror stories about > managing them. Also they are extremely expensive. A DAS would be another > option, but I'm not sure if a DAS can be connected to two servers for server > failover purposes. > > Currently I am considering not using a shared filesystem and instead using > replication between the two servers. > > I am wondering what solutions have others used for my active-passive Postgres > failover scenario? Is a NAS still not a recommended approach? Will a DAS > work? Or is replication the best approach?
DAS will absolutely work. Just be careful to fence things properly so that you don't end up with 2 servers trying to start the data directory at the same time. It will lead to some pretty nasty corruption. > > -- > Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin > -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
