On Apr 25, 2012, at 10:11 AM, Scott Whitney wrote:

> I believe, then, that when I restart server #3 (the standby who is 
> replicating), he'll say "oh, geez, I was down, let me catch up on all that 
> crap that happened while I was out of the loop," he'll replay the WAL files 
> that were written while he was down, and then he'll catch back up.
> 
> Does this sound like a viable option? Or does someone have additional 
> suggestions?

Perfectly viable. However, the WAL files must exist for this to happen. So you 
need to set wal_keep_segments appropriately, or set up WAL archiving.

Note that you could even provide a more up-to-date database for your people to 
work with. If the testbed is nearly up to date, then an rsync to update it 
would take very little time. So you could shut down the replica, rsync, and 
bring the replica back up.


-- 
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice





-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin

Reply via email to