Hi Tom
If you don't want that, you can use a WITH to lock down the result of a
single random() call.
How should I do it?
于 2012-7-25 10:55, Tom Lane 写道:
> wangqi <wan...@edgesoft.cn> writes:
>> ■SQL-3
>> select * from wk_mclid1 where id1= (round((random() * (10-1))::integer)
>> + 1)::integer;
>> When we excute SQL-3,sometimes the result was 0 record or more than 1
>> record.
>> Why?
> random() is re-evaluated for each row scanned by the SELECT.
>
> If you don't want that, you can use a WITH to lock down the result of a
> single random() call.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
----------------------------------------------------
Yours sincerely,
Qi Wang
Edgesoft (China) Co.,Ltd
F26th Block B,Zhongli Building,
No.32 Huoju Road,
Hi-Tech Zone,Dalian,China
Zip:116023
Tel:+86-411-84753511
Fax:+86-411-84753577
http://www.edgesoft.cn
mailto:wan...@edgesoft.cn
----------------------------------------------------
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
