Ned Wolpert wrote:
> I'm doing a postmortem on a corruption event we had. I have an idea on what
> happened, but not sure.
> I figure I'd share what happened and see if I'm close to right here.
>
> Event: Running 9.1.6 with hot-standby, archiving 4 months of wal files, and
> even a nightly pg_dump
> all. 50G database. Trying to update or delete a row in a small (21 row, but
> heavily used table) would
> lock up completely. Never finish. Removed all clients, restarted the db
> instance, no joy. Check
> pg_stat_activity, and nothing that wasn't idle.... run the delete, locked up.
>
> Ran (SELECT*FROM pg_class JOIN pg_locks ON pg_locks.relation =
> pg_class.oid;) with no clients
> touching this row, fresh restart of the db, and saw virtualtransactions
> against this same table where
> the values would be -1/nnnnn were nnnnn was a huge number. Turns out we had
> about 159 entries from
> different tables in the database. Checked hot-standby and, of course, no
> locks or anything. Switched
> to hot-standby.
>
> Hot-standby instantly gained these locks, Also noticed that 2 prepared
> transactions migrated to the
> hot-standby. Binary upgraded to 9.1.8, locks still existed. Ended up
> executing the one thing we knew
> would work. Take the site down, pg_dumpall to fresh instance. Everything is
> fine.
>
> A little more background: We were running 9.1.4 back when 9.1.6 came out. We
> saw there was possible
> corruption issues and did a binary upgrade and reindexing. Everything seemed
> to be fine, but I wonder
> if we really had problems back then. We rebuilt the hot-standby after the
> binary upgrade via normal
> restore and wal-file replays. I should also note that this row that had the
> lock on it that would not
> go away, was created by an app server that was killed (via -9) since it was
> non-responsive, and the
> row 'create date' (in db and logs) is the exact time the app server was
> killed.
>
> I was wondering if a) these virtualtransactions that start with '-1/'
> indicate a problem, b) if this
> could have happened from pre 9.1.6 corruption that was fixed in 9.1.6. Or,
> could this have occurred
> when we killed that app server? Or.... am I looking in the wrong place.
>
> I do still have the old data directories so I can start them up and check out
> the dataset. Any advice?
What do you get for
SELECT * FROM pg_prepared_xacts;
Have you tried to ROLLBACK PREPARED those prepared transactions?
The "-1" is quite alright:
BEGIN;
INSERT INTO addr VALUES (10, '127.0.0.1');
PREPARE TRANSACTION 'test';
test=> SELECT * FROM pg_prepared_xacts;
transaction | gid | prepared | owner | database
-------------+------+-------------------------------+---------+----------
2275 | test | 2013-02-22 09:09:04.627137+01 | laurenz | test
test=> SELECT database, relation, transactionid, virtualtransaction, mode FROM
pg_locks;
database | relation | transactionid | virtualtransaction | mode
----------+----------+---------------+--------------------+------------------
16421 | 11069 | | 2/15 | AccessShareLock
| | | 2/15 | ExclusiveLock
| | 2275 | -1/2275 | ExclusiveLock
16421 | 24711 | | -1/2275 | RowExclusiveLock
(4 rows)
The last two rows are the prepared transaction.
ROLLBACK PREPARED 'test';
Gets rid of them.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
