R Ravishankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Moreover it was found that if we retrieve the resultset as a getString instead of a
>getTimestamp, it returns correctly.
Oh? That suggests that the problem is in JDBC or the underlying JVM.
I'd suggest asking the pgsql-jdbc list about it.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
