Guy Thornley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Below is a patch for the lazy vacuum. It implements a simple I/O throttle so
> boxen arnt killed for hours a day when VACUUM runs.

Wasn't this idea tried and rejected already?  You haven't given us any
information about actual performance.

> The usleep() could be replaced with a select() call with a timeout an no
> fd_set's to aid portability..

usleep is not portable, AFAIR.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

               http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to