Look at this:
        
        test=> CREATE SEQUENCE x;
        CREATE SEQUENCE
        test=> \d x
           Sequence "public.x"
            Column     |  Type
        ---------------+---------
         sequence_name | name
         last_value    | bigint
         increment_by  | bigint
         max_value     | bigint
         min_value     | bigint
         cache_value   | bigint
         log_cnt       | bigint
         is_cycled     | boolean
         is_called     | boolean
        
        test=> SELECT * FROM x;
         sequence_name | last_value | increment_by |      max_value      |
        min_value | cache_value | log_cnt | is_cycled | is_called
        
---------------+------------+--------------+---------------------+-----------+-------------+---------+-----------+-----------
        
         x             |          1 |            1 | 9223372036854775807 |      
          1 |           1 |       1 | f         | f
        (1 row)

I suspect you have a very high increment_by value for the sequence:

       CREATE [ TEMPORARY | TEMP ] SEQUENCE name [ INCREMENT [ BY ] increment ]
           [ MINVALUE minvalue | NO MINVALUE ] [ MAXVALUE maxvalue | NO MAXVALUE ]
           [ START [ WITH ] start ] [ CACHE cache ] [ [ NO ] CYCLE ]

I wish we had a better way to show sequence information.  \ds+ doesn't
see to show much detail.  I have added a TODO:

        * Have psql show more information about sequences

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alexander Troppmann wrote:
> ============================================================================
>                         POSTGRESQL BUG REPORT TEMPLATE
> ============================================================================
> 
> Your name           : Alexander Troppmann
> Your email address  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> System Configuration
> --------------------
> Architecture        : AMD Duron
> Operating System    : Fedora Core 1.A (Linux 2.4.22-1.2174.nptl)
> PostgreSQL version  : PostgreSQL-7.3.4
> Compiler used       : gcc-3.3.2
> 
> 
> Please enter a FULL description of your problem:
> ------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> The nextval() function returns instead of the next valid integer value in the
> corresponding SEQUENCE a whole range of exactly 435 values with each function
> call... The sequence and tables have been migrated from a previous PostgreSQL
> version - newer created tables and sequences work fine!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please describe a way to repeat the problem.   Please try to provide a
> concise reproducible example, if at all possible:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> My database has been migrated from previous versions of PostgreSQL. One table
> is called "recipe" and has a column "id" of type SERIAL as primary key:
> 
>  Column  | Type      |             Modifiers
> ---------+-----------+----------------------------------------------------
>  id      | integer   | not null default nextval('"recipe_id_seq"'::text)
> 
> I din't use the features from a SERIAL type on this table before but at the
> moment I'm working on a complete new database frontend.... So first I tried
> to update the value of the "recipe_id_seq" SEQUENCE appropriate to the
> latest recipe.id value:
> 
>    SELECT SETVAL('recipe_id_seq', max(id)) FROM recipe;
> 
> returns the following output:
> 
>     setval
>    --------
>        455
>    (1 row)
> 
> Now I tried to fetch the next free primary key id for my "recipe" table:
> 
>    SELECT NEXTVAL('recipe_id_seq') FROM receipt;
> 
> I just wonder because the NEXTVAL query returns after every call exactly
> 435 rows of increasing integer values...?! Also I tested some other tables
> with a SERIAL primary key and the same result - instead of the next valid
> integer value I get a whole range of values, 435 times...
> 
> A table created with a PostgreSQL 7.3.x version works fine - the SEQUENCE
> returns exactly (the next valid) integer value - so maybe the migrated table
> structures/data from my previous PostgreSQL installations cause the troubles?
> 
> I already tried to fix the problem by dropping the "recipe_id_seq" and 
> creating a new one - with any success... :-(
> 
> 
> 
> best regards,
> Alex Troppmann
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to