On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:29:12PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Of course, sooner or later we should fix the underlying locking > mechanism so we don't have to have this constraint, but I'm not sure > when that will happen.
Hm, can we use LockSharedObject? It's on my shared dependency patch. What needs to be locked? Maybe we need to take a AccessShareLock on the pg_database row for schema changes, and AccessExclusiveLock on same for database creation. -- Alvaro Herrera (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) "La Primavera ha venido. Nadie sabe como ha sido" (A. Machado) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
