Neil Conway wrote:
I think we _can_ do it that way, it's just a question of whether that is
the best approach. I think the solution I outlined before would work
fine: pass the length of the working buffer to ParseDateTime(), and
reject the input only if the parsing process actually requires more
working space than was provided. [...]
Or we could rewrite how we do parsing, which seems to be what you're
suggesting.
Any thoughts on this, Tom? If you're planning on doing the rewrite you
described, that's fine; alternatively I'm happy to implement the fix
that I described above.
-Neil
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
