"Bennett, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> It appears that the timestamp 'epoch' is being interpreted as
>>> relative to the local timezone, rather than being an absolute time.
>>
>> This is correct for timestamp ... you want timestamp with time zone.
> Sorry, but that's dumb (IMHO). The unix epoch is not relative to the
> local timezone.
Sorry, but you're out of luck on that. A timestamp without time zone
cannot represent any absolute time at all --- assuming that it does
amounts to ascribing a timezone to it, which we don't do in general.
Perhaps it would make more sense to refuse the "epoch" keyword in the
context of timestamp without timezone ...
> create function epoch(integer)
> returns timestamp with time zone
> as 'select timestamp with time zone \'epoch\'
> + interval \'1 second\' * $1;'
> language sql immutable;
> Is there a better way?
You might want to call this to_timestamp(), since that's what it's going
to be called in 8.1 ;-)
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
