Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is probably not "broken collation order" but instead how those > locales are defined.
I'd only consider it "broken" if you get different sort order from sort(1) under the same locale. Here is an example from Fedora 4 showing that sort(1) has the same ideas about what de_DE sort order is: [tgl ~]$ cat zzz SUEKO SUE E SUE T [tgl ~]$ sort zzz SUE E SUE T SUEKO [tgl ~]$ LANG=de_DE.utf8 sort zzz SUE E SUEKO SUE T [tgl ~]$ regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly