Hi Tom, Yes. It looks like that works properly. And I'm replying because I had a hard time to write the actual SQL command! I put it below.
It looks like your page about the joins would need a few examples. I tried different syntax and they didn't work (thought they are valid for MySQL or Oracle). For instance, the first three tables, I would think I can define them like this: (phpbb_users u, phpbb_forums_watch fw, phpbb_topics t) LEFT JOIN ... but postgres doesn't like it. I had to use CROSS JOIN instead. One other thing, which is certainly a bit harder right now, when I forget to put the ON clause, the parser gives me an error saying "I don't understand that WHERE". It would be much more helpful to have a message such as "I don't like the WHERE here because I expected an ON statement." This is certainly trickier to fix however. 8-) SELECT u.user_id, u.user_name, t.topic_title FROM phpbb_users u CROSS JOIN phpbb_forums_watch fw CROSS JOIN phpbb_topics t LEFT JOIN phpbb_topics_watch tw ON u.user_id = tw.user_id WHERE (t.topic_id = 1 -- some variable id AND fw.forum_id = t.forum_id AND fw.user_id = u.user_id) OR (tw.topic_id = 1 AND u.user_id = tw.user_id AND t.topic_id = 1) ; Thank you very much for your hints. Alexis On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Tom Lane wrote: > "Alexis Wilke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > -- In this select, it detects that the phpbb_topics_watch is > > -- empty and thus ignores the WHERE clause thinking since that > > -- table is empty the SELECT will be empty > > SELECT 'The next SELECT finds 0 row. It should find the same row!' AS > > message; > > SELECT u.user_id, u.user_name, t.topic_title > > FROM phpbb_users u, phpbb_forums_watch fw, phpbb_topics t, > > phpbb_topics_watch tw > > WHERE > > (t.topic_id = 1 -- some variable id > > AND fw.forum_id = t.forum_id > > AND fw.user_id = u.user_id) > > OR > > (tw.topic_id = 1 > > AND u.user_id = tw.user_id > > AND t.topic_id = 1); > > I see no bug here. This SELECT is defined to return the rows in the > cartesian product of the four FROM tables that satisfy the WHERE > condition. Since one of the tables is empty, so is the cartesian > product. > > Perhaps you meant to use a LEFT JOIN? > > regards, tom lane > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly