""Brock Peabody"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
> FATAL: semctl(167894456, 4, SETVAL, 0) failed: A non-blocking socket
> operation could not be completed immediately.
>
Can you reliablly reproduce the problem? If so, we may come up with a
testing patch to it. We encounter similar problems before but it is hard to
reproduce.
Magnus? As Bruce suggested, we can plug in a check-EINTR-loop here in
semctl():
/* Quickly lock/unlock the semaphore (if we can) */
if (semop(semId, &sops, 1) < 0)
return -1;
Regards,
Qingqing
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
