Klint Gore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (Someone who knows more than I do might comment on what happens > to unqualfied field names when the add missing from brings in another > field with the same name?)
Nothing --- it's always been the case that unqualified field names have to reference one of the explicitly-listed FROM tables. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend