On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 07:31:44AM -0500, Roberts, Jon wrote:

> The cost is significantly lower but the total runtime is higher.  

Um, so you want developers to change the thing so that it performs
more slowly, but has a prettier estimate of how much work it's going
to do?  That seems like a poor optimisation to me.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The whole tendency of modern prose is away from concreteness.
                --George Orwell

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

Reply via email to