Am Freitag, 12. Oktober 2007 schrieb Tom Lane: > Sorry, you don't get to put JOHAB back into the portion of the list that > is backend-legal encodings. > > It's a bit nasty that this enum is exposed as part of the ABI, but I'm > afraid we may be stuck with that decision.
Perhaps we should leave a gap where JOHAB used to be and add it at the end. Otherwise we may have to do a soname exercise. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
