"MATSUDA, Daiki" <d.mat...@gmail.com> writes: > - int count = 0; > - int subcount = 0; > + uint32 count = 0; > + int32 subcount = 0;
This is really unimportant, since neither counter could possibly
approach the point of overflow. (If they could, we'd need to install
active defenses against that, not just tweak the datatypes...)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
