Tom Lane escribió:
> Jaime Casanova <jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec> writes:
> > this one applies, compiles and it actually fixes the bug...
> 
> And introduces a bunch of new ones.  Surely you don't think that version
> of compatible_tupdesc() is good enough.

Getting rid of the check on natts was "ungood" ... it needs to compare
the number of undropped columns of both tupdescs.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Reply via email to