"Kevin Grittner" <[email protected]> writes:
> Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Suppose that after the postmaster is fully up, it writes a file
>> $PGDATA/postmaster.ports, with contents along the lines of
>>
>> 5432
>> /tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432
> The listen_addresses setting would need to figure in, too.
Yeah, I'm not entirely sure how we'd want to deal with IP addresses,
but in principle there could be a line for each postmaster socket not
only the Unix-domain socket.
> This seems likely to overlap the review I was soon going to do of the
> differences between pg_ctl behavior and what is required for LSB
> conformance.
Agreed, it would be good to do a holistic review of what pg_ctl needs.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
