On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 06:23, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >>> On Saturday, November 14, 2009, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>>> Not 8.2? > >> Done. > > Buildfarm member narwhal seems to think it's not quite right in 8.2.
Drat. So, the new API function requires Windows 2000 or more, and I think the reason it's failing is that the headers in 8.2 don't specify that at this point. Which means that 8.2 today theoretically at least runs on NT4. Which leads to the question - do we want to back out the patch, have 8.2 keep working on that, and having 8.2 fail in the few unusual scenarios we have now, or do we also backpatch the requirement to run on win2k or later? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
