Tom -
Didn't realize I was arm waving - was I? (Sometimes email falls well short...)
We've managed a build of PostgreSQL 9.0-alpha4 - nice! However, the # make
install command apparently(?) hiccups
on a dependency on Jade (we ain't usin' it!)
Here's the exact make install output:
- - - snip
make[3]: Entering directory `/media/SOURCES/postgresql-9.0alpha4/doc/src/sgml'
{ \
echo "<!entity version \"9.0alpha4\">"; \
echo "<!entity majorversion \"9.0\">"; \
} >version.sgml
"/usr/local/bin/perl" ./mk_feature_tables.pl YES
../../../src/backend/catalog/sql_feature_packages.txt
../../../src/backend/catalog/sql_features.txt > features-supported.sgml
"/usr/local/bin/perl" ./mk_feature_tables.pl NO
../../../src/backend/catalog/sql_feature_packages.txt
../../../src/backend/catalog/sql_features.txt > features-unsupported.sgml
jade -wall -wno-unused-param -wno-empty -wfully-tagged -D . -D . -c
/usr/share/sgml/docbook/dsssl-stylesheets/catalog -d stylesheet.dsl -t sgml -i
output-html -V html-index postgres.sgml
make[3]: jade: Command not found
make[3]: *** [HTML.index] Error 127
make[3]: Leaving directory `/media/SOURCES/postgresql-9.0alpha4/doc/src/sgml'
make[2]: *** [install] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/media/SOURCES/postgresql-9.0alpha4/doc/src'
make[1]: *** [install] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/media/SOURCES/postgresql-9.0alpha4/doc'
make: *** [install] Error 2
- - - snip
Looking at the Error 127; chown'd all files to root, then tried the make
install again - as root - with same result.
Got around this by commenting out the $DOC line in GNUmakefile's make install
section, and seem to have installed rest of the build AOK…
Would it make sense: to have more granular control over docs build in the
config script - specific kinds of docs/no docs at all/etc?
Thanks for any help, and for the great work! We love PostgreSQL!
Lou
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Lou Picciano" <loupicci...@comcast.net>
Cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 11:08:19 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Lou Picciano <loupicci...@comcast.net> writes:
> Not sure it's exactly a bug, but in attempting a compile of
> PostgreSQL-9.0alpha, we are getting a choke on jade (don't have jade on this
> system)
> Can the config script test for jade or, better yet, allow an option to turn
> off build of documentation?
Would you show exactly what happened rather than arm-waving? I'm sure
that the majority of the buildfarm machines don't have jade installed,
but they're getting through their builds OK.
(And yes, there *is* a configure check.)
regards, tom lane
