On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 18:44, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 17:48, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Craig Ringer <cr...@postnewspapers.com.au> writes: >>>> Bug 5245 is not the same issue. >>> >>> BTW, does anyone know exactly how to fix that? I'm looking at a related >>> request internal to Red Hat right now. > >> I have it on my TODO to figure it out, but from what I can tell it's >> very close to being undocumented, like most of OpenSSL. > > I've been googling this a bit, and the theory I have at the moment is > that Craig's proposed fix for #5468 will *also* fix #5245. However, > I'm not too adept at using openssl so actually testing that will > probably take a bit of time. Are you in a position to check it quickly?
'fraid not. I'm doing intensive training this week, so the first chance I'll have to give a proper check of it will be next week. sorry. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
