Brian Ceccarelli <bceccare...@net32.com> writes:
>      STABLE no longer means STABLE.  This behavior is killing my performance. 
>  I am getting 500% to 30000% increase in latency.

You seem to be under the illusion that "stable" is a control knob for a
function result cache.  It is not, and never has been.  Postgres doesn't
do function result caching.

If you've constructed your app in such a way that it depends on not
inlining SQL set-returning functions, it's fairly easy to defeat that.
>From memory, marking a SRF as either strict or volatile will do it
(although volatile might cause you problems elsewhere --- I suspect
your design is pretty brittle in this area).

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Reply via email to