On 12/15/10 4:58 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> > In any case, a doc patch would be the right thing for the back branches.
> 
> I can look at this too (yes, I know we just wrapped, but I'm working
> down the backlog :S). You mean something as simple as "this parameter
> is unavailable if the server was not compiled with support for SSL"?

Exactly.  If you don't get around to it, bug me in January.

-- 
                                  -- Josh Berkus
                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                                     http://www.pgexperts.com

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Reply via email to