On 12/15/10 4:58 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> > In any case, a doc patch would be the right thing for the back branches. > > I can look at this too (yes, I know we just wrapped, but I'm working > down the backlog :S). You mean something as simple as "this parameter > is unavailable if the server was not compiled with support for SSL"?
Exactly. If you don't get around to it, bug me in January. -- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://www.pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs