Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > so far as I can see the spec simply disallows a > not-explicitly-cast NULL constant in cases like this, which seems > if anything even less friendly than what we're doing. Just to illustrate the current behavior: test=# select null union select 1; ?column? ---------- 1
(2 rows) test=# select null union select null union select 1; ERROR: UNION types text and integer cannot be matched LINE 1: select null union select null union select 1; ^ test=# select null union (select null union select 1); ?column? ---------- 1 (2 rows) So, we're talking about making the second of these three cases work, too. I'm not sure the spec requires *any* of them to work. -Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs