On ons, 2011-06-08 at 11:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > The omission of collection_type_identifier from the docs is clearly a > doc bug. However, it looks to me like you've identified an error in the > view definition, not only a doc bug. I think the values of the > dtd_identifier and collection_type_identifier columns are swapped, ie, > we ought to be prepending 'a' to the collection_type_identifier not the > dtd_identifier. As far as I can tell from the spec, dtd_identifier > ought to be the identifier of the element type, while > collection_type_identifier should be a made-up identifier for the array > type. That would make the sample query given in the docs correct.
Yes, we need to switch those two columns around and change the documentation. > If my analysis is correct, we really ought to try to fix this in time > for beta2, since there's no way to fix it without a forced initdb. I can take care of this later today. -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
